Avoidance of pre-analytical errors in laboratory testing: a neglected area needing prompt attention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37018/JFJMU/1578Abstract
Medical errors have significant impact on patient outcomes; therefore, reducing them is critical for patient safety. Medical errors can be classified as diagnostic, therapeutic, preventive, or rehabilitative. Even as technology advances, these errors remain a significant issue in medical practice.1 In laboratory medicine, three types of diagnostic errors can be identified in the processing of laboratory samples: preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical errors.2 Before a sample is prepared for analysis, preanalytical activity starts with a clinical request for a laboratory test. Preanalytical errors are the errors that happen prior to the actual analysis of a specimen. All three stages of the entire test procedure must be error-free to qualify for the results to be reported accurately. Pre-analytical errors are a significant source of errors in laboratory testing and thus may compromise patient care. In the analytical and postanalytical phases, automation has greatly decreased errors. However, because the preanalytical stage still relies heavily on human handling, there is still considerable room for improvement. The errors in this stage can range from sample collection to testing preparation, and need to be eliminated because they account for 70% of all errors in the diagnostic process.3
Sample mix-ups, inadequate sample amounts, incorrect labelling, and transportation delays are examples of common preanalytical errors.4 These errors frequently result in sample rejection because of hemolysis, incorrect tubes, and clotted blood.5 Patient safety and best practices may be jeopardized if these errors are not identified and fixed, which could delay the diagnosis and subsequent course of treatment. Minimizing these errors could be accomplished by training personnel who perform blood sampling on daily basis and adhering to standard laboratory procedures.6 The venipuncture and collection of sample in appropriate tubes are important steps and have been identified as the most frequent causes of pre-analytical errors.3-5 Blood samples are susceptible to hemolysis because of using small-bored needles, moving the plunger quickly, and shaking the sample vigorously in
DOI: http:/doi.org/10.37018/JFJMU/1578
the collection tube after using incorrect phlebotomy technique. Selecting the incorrect blood collection tubes may result in the insufficient blood needed for analysis, cause clots due to improper additives or blood-anticoagulant mixing, lead to measurement errors of analytes. Furthermore some of the analytes may be falsely elevated due to phenomenon of hemoconcentration due to prolonged or inappropriate torniquet application. Samples that are rejected due to incorrect labeling lead to misidentification, and delay patients’ diagnosis and management while putting additional burden on wastes resources. Sample integrity is compromised by poor storage conditions, delayed transportation, and sample processing, which leads to erroneous lab results. Moreover, laboratory results are influenced by drug-test interactions that may lead to inappropriate results. It is imperative to obtain information regarding the medications being taken by the patient.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University follows the Attribution Creative Commons-Non commercial (CC BY-NC) license which allows the users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and build upon the material. The users must give credit to the source and indicate, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. However, the CC By-NC license restricts the use of material for commercial purposes. For further details about the license please check the Creative Commons website. The editorial board of JFJMU strives hard for the authenticity and accuracy of the material published in the journal. However, findings and statements are views of the authors and do not necessarily represent views of the Editorial Board.