Histological and Radiological Correlation in the Diagnosis of Bone Tumors
Keywords:
: Bone tumors, Plain radiographs, MRI, CT scan, Malignant tumorsAbstract
Objective: To Determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of radiological results of bone tumors, taking histological findings as the gold standard. Study design: Descriptive case series Subjects & methodology: Thirty cases of clinically suspected and with radiological evidence of bone tumors were included in this study. The specimens were sent to the Histopathology Department, fixed in 10% formaline. Results: The peak age incidence of bone tumors was between 10 to 20 years age groups, with mean age 22.87±12.13, while minimum number of patients were above 40 years age. The study revealed more males 20 cases (66.7%) with bone tumors than females 10 (33.3%). Histopathologically, 12 tumors were malignant and radiology suggested 10 tumors as malignant, Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of radiological findings were found as 83.3%, 100.0%, 93.3%, 100.0% and 90.0%, respectively. Conclusion: The histopathology appears slightly more accurate compared to radiology in typing, grading and staging of the bone tumors and remains the gold standard.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University follows the Attribution Creative Commons-Non commercial (CC BY-NC) license which allows the users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and build upon the material. The users must give credit to the source and indicate, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. However, the CC By-NC license restricts the use of material for commercial purposes. For further details about the license please check the Creative Commons website. The editorial board of JFJMU strives hard for the authenticity and accuracy of the material published in the journal. However, findings and statements are views of the authors and do not necessarily represent views of the Editorial Board.