Accuracy of Intra Ocular Lens Power Calculation
Keywords:
Cataract, axial length, keratometry, spherical equivalentAbstract
Objectives: To assess the accuracy of posterior chamber intraocular lens power calculation. Study design: Prospective analytical study. Place and duration of study: Department of Ophthalmology, Jinnah Hospital and Mayo Hospital Lahore. October 2002 to December 2002 and October 2006 to January 2007. Subject and methods: A study of 100 cataractous eyes of patients attending the outpatients department and admitted in the ward. As the intraocular lens implanted is planned for emmetropia by using SRK II regression formula, mean deviation of the post-operative pseudophakic refractive error were noted. In case of cylindrical error, half of the error was taken as spherical equivalent. Range of error, mean error, and standard deviation were calculated Results: The corrected postoperative visual acuity was 6/6 in 47 patients (47%), 6/9 in 39 patients (39 %), 6/12 in 13 patients (13 %) and 6/18 in 1 (1%) patient. Postoperative spherical equivalent was found to be 0 in 42 patients (42 %), ± 1D in 29 (29 %) patients, ± 2D in 20 (20 %) patients, ± 3D in 9 (9 %) patients. Conclusion: The calculation of IOL power from biometric data offers valuable control over the postoperative refraction with the virtual elimination of significant unwanted postoperative refractive errors.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University follows the Attribution Creative Commons-Non commercial (CC BY-NC) license which allows the users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and build upon the material. The users must give credit to the source and indicate, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. However, the CC By-NC license restricts the use of material for commercial purposes. For further details about the license please check the Creative Commons website. The editorial board of JFJMU strives hard for the authenticity and accuracy of the material published in the journal. However, findings and statements are views of the authors and do not necessarily represent views of the Editorial Board.