Prevalence of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus and its Current Antimicrobial Susceptibility Pattern in Clinical Isolates
Keywords:
Staph. aureus, MSRA, sensitivity pattern, prevalence of MRSAAbstract
Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a Gram positive bacterium and is frequent cause of infections worldwide. It is resistant to a large group of antibiotics called beta-lactams. The objective of our study was to determine the prevalence of MRSA and to assess its current antibiotic susceptibility pattern. The study was conducted in June, 2014 to November 2014 and 100 cases of staphylococcus positive were selected for this study. The 56% of isolates were from male and 44% were from female patients. Out of 100 isolates of S. aureus 53% were Methicillin resistant. Most of the MSRA specimens were found to be susceptible to vancomycin, whereas most were resistant to ampicillin and cephradin. MSRA isolates were 69% in hospitalized patients and majority was isolated from pus (67%), followed by from sputum samples (21%). The study concluded that to curb the occurrence of MSRA, continuous monitoring of hospital acquired infections and surveillance of antibiotic susceptibility pattern is essential. Proper detection of all MSRA with accurate and quick assays must be adopted as a routine laboratory procedure.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The Journal of Fatima Jinnah Medical University follows the Attribution Creative Commons-Non commercial (CC BY-NC) license which allows the users to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform and build upon the material. The users must give credit to the source and indicate, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. However, the CC By-NC license restricts the use of material for commercial purposes. For further details about the license please check the Creative Commons website. The editorial board of JFJMU strives hard for the authenticity and accuracy of the material published in the journal. However, findings and statements are views of the authors and do not necessarily represent views of the Editorial Board.
